In the story of Guille, an autistic child, I will explain the two steps necessary to consider the possible treatment of this condition. He Lacked a place in the scheme of symbolic relationships of the family, was in a non-places. The first part of the process was to point out a possible place for Guille within the family: it was a paradox that this place was given through a diagnosis that, far from freezing him in a category, allowed the family to begin viewing him like a member Having established this, the second part of the work consisted of an account of the processes of identification Guille developed during the sessions. Gradually, and marking our differences, the process allowed the operation of projective identification, creating an inner space where inner objects was metabolized. The first object introjected were the analyst and his internal objects that represented the analytic setting, foreshadowing the parental couple; this introjections opened the possibility of interpreting, give meaning to motor stereotypes that Guille was doing and who were considered mere physiological automatism. The introjections of the analytic couple made possible to give a human meaning to what was mere automatic responses.