![##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##](https://revistas.up.ac.pa/public/journals/2/pageHeaderLogoImage_es_ES.png)
In this research we will carry out a dogmatic and normative analysis of the special contentious-administrative process for the protection of human rights in the Panamanian legislation, which has its genesis in the early nineties by a bill presented by the magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice in exercise of their constitutional power as guarantors of the rights of the administered, with the purpose of restoring or repairing a right violated by means of administrative acts. This process has as its main objective the safeguard of justiciable human rights; in this sense, we make a brief explanation of what we understand by justiciable human rights, which are those justiciable rights enforceable before our jurisdictional bodies, and we conclude with the analysis of the characteristics and procedural assumptions of admissibility of the claim presented by this type of processes before the Third Chamber of the Contentious-Administrative in Panama