Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Submitted August 24, 2026
Published 2026-08-24

Artículos

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Graphosmedia

Collegial journalism vs. empiricism in Panama: professionalization, freedom of expression, and the public's right to be well informed


DOI https://doi.org/10.48204/j.graphos.v2n1.a11135

Cover image

References
DOI: 10.48204/j.graphos.v2n1.a11135

Published: 2026-08-24

How to Cite

Herrera B., J. R. (2026). Collegial journalism vs. empiricism in Panama: professionalization, freedom of expression, and the public’s right to be well informed. Graphosmedia, 2(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.48204/j.graphos.v2n1.a11135

Abstract

This article examines the historical and practical tension between professionalized (guild-based) journalism and empiricism in Panama, from the perspectives of human rights, higher education, and news quality. Building on Inter-American standards on freedom of expression (Advisory Opinion OC-5/85), Panama’s Access to Information Law (Law 6/2002), and UNESCO/IACHR documents, the study argues that voluntary professional membership—based on ethics, continuing education, and certification—can strengthen the public’s right to be well-informed without conflicting with the regional ban on compulsory licensing.

The research employs a documentary-analytical approach, reviewing normative frameworks, comparative reports, and recent scholarship to propose a non-coercive professionalization model with minimum standards of quality, ethics, and transparency. Implications for newsrooms, universities, and professional guilds are discussed, and a roadmap with verifiable indicators is presented to elevate journalistic practice in Panama.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.