Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Submitted July 30, 2020
Published 2020-07-30

Artículos

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Revista Saberes APUDEP

BORDERLINE BETWEEN PERPETRATORSHIP AND CRIMINAL PARTICIPATION


DOI https://doi.org/10.48204/j.saberes.v3n2a2

Cover image

References
DOI: 10.48204/j.saberes.v3n2a2

Published: 2020-07-30

How to Cite

Arenas Nero, O. (2020). BORDERLINE BETWEEN PERPETRATORSHIP AND CRIMINAL PARTICIPATION. Revista Saberes APUDEP, 3(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.48204/j.saberes.v3n2a2

Abstract

This paper explained how the delimitation between perpetratorship and criminal participation has been understood in Panamanian and foreign criminal theory. To achieve this, a review of the main theories is made. Objective-formal theory was analyzed first, then material theory, then subjective theory, and finally, the theory of the control over. National and international bibliographic review techniques were used. In it was concluded, among others, that the theory of the control over is the dominant one in the penal theory, however, the subjective theory has not been totally overcome, so it maintains a level of acceptance; while objective theories were overcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.