This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In this investigation we carry out a dogmatic and normative analysis of the Contentious Administrative Action of Full Jurisdiction in the Panamanian-positive law, which has its genesis in the 1946 Constitution, and that creates the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction in Panama, as a court of only agency, independent of the other State bodies, whose mission was to guarantee the control of the legality of the actions of public sector entities, and if any subjective right has been violated due to the illegal action of the public administration, its main objective is to restore or repair the violated right. This action is aimed at challenging administrative acts that have directly violated the rights of individuals; therefore, anyone who files the process in question must request the restoration of the broken right and specify the claims that are sought with the process. In that sense, we will provide a concept of the action that is the object of this article. In addition we will analyze the characteristics and general procedural assumptions fundamental for the presentation of the action and the requirements that any demand that is established before the Third Chamber must contain. Contentious-Administrative Matters in Panama.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
