CULTURAL PRACTICES AS ANTAGONISTS OR ALLIES TO SUCCESS: JUEGA VIVO IN PANAMA

Gabisell Barsallo Alvarado

Enviado abril 29, 2021

Publicado 2021-08-02

Artículos

n. 18 (2021): Cátedra

CULTURAL PRACTICES AS ANTAGONISTS OR ALLIES TO SUCCESS: JUEGA VIVO IN PANAMA

Gabisell Barsallo Alvarado⁺⁻

PDF (Español (España))

Citación:

DOI: ND

Publicado: 2021-08-02

Como Citar

Barsallo Alvarado, G. (2021). CULTURAL PRACTICES AS ANTAGONISTS OR ALLIES TO SUCCESS: JUEGA VIVO IN PANAMA. Cátedra, (18), 188–197. Recuperado de https://revistas.up.ac.pa/index.php/catedra/article/view/2117

Declaração de Direito Autoral

Resumo

As we approach the concept of Juega vivo, we quickly associate it with cunning, especially if we were born in Panama and if by practicing it we have obtained achievements or other benefits. The objective of this article is to reflect on some social realities that surround Panamanian society. The fundamental idea illustrated on this occasion is the juega vivo since its manifestation day by day, its beginning and its similarities with other countries of the continent (Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil) as documented in literature. The article also considers the incidence of juega vivo as a system of general corruption, its transformation from ideas to practices and finally raised to the category of culture, and is related to lack of values and detriment of education at all levels. All these aspects help us to understand the extension of juega vivo as a phenomenon that, according to the perception of the individual, can be negative or, on the contrary, used as a concept that can result in positive practices to generate change and human development of the country.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Achugar, H., Dominzain, S., Radakovich, R. & Rapetti, S. (2002). Imaginarios y consumo cultural.
Primer informe nacional sobre consumo y comportamiento cultural. Montevideo: Trilce Almeida, A. (2007). A cabeça do brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Record.
Alvarado Castaneda, L. (1995). La herencia perdida. Entornos, 1(9), 111-115. https://journalusco.edu.co/index.php/entornos/article/view/304/0
Arrarás, A., Bitencourt, L., Cruz, J. M., Lantis, J., Maingot, A., Martín, F. & Uribe, V. (2017).
Culture and National Security in the Americas. Lexington Books.
Conchacala Gil, I. (2018). ¿Qué es la malicia indígena? https://www.memoriaindigena.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/05/que-es-la-malicia-indigenas.pdf
Drummond, J. A. (1995). O jeitinho brasileiro: A arte de ser mais igual que os outros by Livia Barbosa. Luso-Brazilian Review, 32 (2), 113-116. Culture and Ideology in the Americas: Essays in Honor of Richard M. Morse. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3513632
Duarte, F. (2006). A Double-edge Sword: The Jeitinho as an Ambiguous Concept in the Brazilian Imaginary. Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, (1),125 -132. Doi:10.18848/1833- 1882/CGP/v01i01/52297A
Espino, E. (September, 2004). Embriología y fisiología del 'juega vivo'. La Prensa Web. https://www.prensa.com/impresa/opinion/Embriologia-fisiologia-juega- vivo_0_1287621322.html
Figueira, G. (1967). Interpretación del Uruguay. Journal of Inter-American Studies, 9(4), 483-487. doi:10.2307/164855
Fuenmayor, E. (June 22, 2020). La viveza criolla. El Nacional. https://www.elnacional.com/opinion/la-viveza-criolla/
Joseph Garzón, G. (November, 2018). Elogio del juega vivo. Opinión. UP Informa Diario Digital. http://upinforma.com/nuevo/info.php?cat=opinion&id=378
Mafud, J. (1973). Psicología de la viveza criolla: contribuciones para una interpretación de la realidad social argentina y americana. Buenos Aires: Editorial Americalee.
McCann, B. (2014). Review of the Book Roots of Brazil, by Sérgio Buarque de Holanda. The Americas 71(2), 367-368. doi:10.1353/tam.2014.0128.
Morales, J. (1998). Mestizaje, malicia indígena y viveza en la construcción del carácter nacional.
Revista de Estudios Sociales, (1), 39-43. http://journals.openedition.org/revestudsoc/31309 Pérez, O. J. (2017). Panama: The Preeminence of Geography and the Transit Route for
Establishing Panama’s Strategic Culture. In Culture and National Security in the Americas. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Pérez, O. J. (2017). Panama: Democracy Under the Shadow of Corruption. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320571529_Panama_Democracy_Under_the_S hadow_of_Corruption
Pulido Ritter, L., (January 25, 2005). Teoría del juega vivo. La Prensa. https://www.prensa.com/impresa/opinion/Teoria-juega-vivo_0_1388111249.html
Rodrigues, R., Milfont, T., Ferreira, M., Porto, J., & Fischer, R. (2011). Brazilian Jeitinho: Understanding and Explaining an Indigenous Psychological Construct. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 29-38. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.972.6629&rep=rep1&type=pd f
Rodrigues Neto, P. (2020). A culpa é do jeitinho brasileiro. Novo Seculo Livraria e Editora Ltda. Saad, A. (March 11, 2014) Panamá verde y sostenible. El conformismo y la sociedad panameña. https://antoniosaad.wordpress.com/2014/03/11/el-conformismo-y-la-sociedad-panamena/
Sautu, R., Bonolio, P., & Perugorría, I. (2004). Percepciones de corrupción y confianza en actores políticos y económicos. En Catálogo de prácticas corruptas: Corrupción, confianza y democracia (139-166). Buenos Aires: Lumiere.
Terán, B. (2018). La ética y lo afirmativo venezolano. Mayéutica; Revista Científica de Humanidades y Artes, (6) 255-276. https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/mayeutica/article/view/1788
Turpana Igwaigliginya, A. (2018). Crítica del Gunasdule. Colección de estudios interdisciplinarios. Buenos Aires: Red de Pensamiento Decolonial (RPD).
Velarde De la Rosa, G. (2001). El Perú actual: entre la cultura de Pepe el vivo y la posibilidad de ser nación. Revista Copé, 11(27), 23-26.
Wilson, J. (2007). Buenos Aires: A cultural and Literary History. Signal Books.