Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Submitted December 2, 2024
Published 2024-12-05

Artículos

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): De iustitia et lege

Analysis of objections in the Panamanian civil process: a practical application


DOI https://doi.org/10.48204/j.iustitia.v1n1.a6480

Cover image

References
DOI: 10.48204/j.iustitia.v1n1.a6480

Published: 2024-12-05

How to Cite

Zeballos, S. (2024). Analysis of objections in the Panamanian civil process: a practical application. De Iustitia Et Lege, 1(1), 253–285. https://doi.org/10.48204/j.iustitia.v1n1.a6480

Abstract

Objections to evidence in proceedings are a tool of great and fundamental importance. These allow lawyers to prevent information or evidence from being brought into the process that could in any way affect a client's legal situation.

However, it is not a question of objecting to evidence for the simple fact of objecting, but rather that it is a question of objections that are necessary, and in addition to meeting the requirements for objecting to evidence, specifically in four cases: That the objection must be presented in a timely manner; That the objection must be based on specific evidence; That the objection must be substantiated and that the objection must be strategic. If the objections do not meet these criteria, they must be rejected by the judge

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.