UN  MODELO PARA EVALUAR LA PERTINENCIA ONTO-EPISTEMOLÓGICA DE LOS OBJETOS DE ESTUDIO EN CIENCIAS SOCIALES

Javier Antonio Torres-Vindas

doi:10.48204/societas.v27n1.5589

Submitted August 16, 2024

Published 2025-01-29

Artículos

Vol. 27 No. 1 (2025): SOCIETAS

A Model to Evaluate the Onto-Epistemological Relevance of Study Objects in Social Sciences

Javier Antonio Torres-Vindas⁺⁻

DOI https://doi.org/10.48204/societas.v27n1.5589

PDF (Español (España))

References

DOI: 10.48204/societas.v27n1.5589

Published: 2025-01-29

How to Cite

Torres-Vindas, J. A. (2025). A Model to Evaluate the Onto-Epistemological Relevance of Study Objects in Social Sciences. Societas, 27(1), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.48204/societas.v27n1.5589

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This academic essay proposes an analytical model to evaluate the coherence between ontological assumptions, epistemological approaches, and methodological strategies in social science research. The objective is to strengthen the rigor and relevance of the knowledge produced by addressing the inherent complexity of social phenomena.

The model is based on the need to articulate the underlying assumptions of theoretical models, the recognition of social complexity and the convenience of a multi-paradigmatic approach, the integration of micro and macro levels, the multilevel perspective, and the concern for the relevance of the objects of study.

Unlike other approaches, this model focuses specifically on onto-epistemological coherence, incorporating recent contributions on complex systems and multilevel analysis. It also emphasizes the identification of the explanatory mechanisms underlying social phenomena.

The model proposes a comprehensive analysis of key elements: the object of study, the theoretical framework, the validity of knowledge, the position of the researcher, and the applicability of knowledge. This allows for a systematic evaluation of the epistemological rigor of social science research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
Bunge, M. (2004). How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 182-210.
Bunge, M. (2019). Scientific research II: The search for truth. Springer.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Fernández, A., & Torres, L. (2019). Epistemological foundations in social sciences research. Journal of Social Sciences, 15(2), 78-92.
Gómez, P., & Pérez, L. (2020). Integrating ontological and epistemological considerations in social science research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-10.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). SAGE Publications.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385-1399.
Jiménez, R., & Sánchez, M. (2022). Toward a holistic epistemology in social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(3), 299-315.
Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672-690.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
Patomäki, H., & Wight, C. (2000). After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 213-237.
Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Ritzer, G. (1990). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington Books.