Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Submitted October 25, 2024
Published 2024-10-25

Artículos de investigación y ensayos filosóficos

No. 4 (2024): Analítica

UN EXAMEN CRÍTICO DE LOS ARGUMENTOS DE PLANTINGA EN DEFENSA DEL EXCLUSIVISMO RELIGIOSO


DOI https://doi.org/10.48204/2805-1815.6089

Cover image

References
DOI: 10.48204/2805-1815.6089

Published: 2024-10-25

How to Cite

Singh , R. (2024) “UN EXAMEN CRÍTICO DE LOS ARGUMENTOS DE PLANTINGA EN DEFENSA DEL EXCLUSIVISMO RELIGIOSO”, Analítica, (4), pp. 173–182. doi: 10.48204/2805-1815.6089.

Abstract

In "Pluralism: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism" Alvin Plantinga defends religious exclusivism from a variety of objections. In this paper I discuss two of those objections. First, where Plantinga set two grounds of their religious beliefs as exclusivist, they missed to mention a third important ground of exclusive believe which is ‘Holy Scriptures’. In this paper I'll try to show that this third ground can change the scenario. Second, in the against of moral objections, like Exclusivists, are guilty of moral failures and arrogant, elitist, egotistical, unjust, oppressive, and imperialistic etc.; Plantinga reply that: Religious exclusivism is not necessarily a moral or intellectual failure and, (because?) given the human condition, some exclusivism is inevitable in our lives. In other words, there is no alternative to religious exclusivism. I argue, in contrast to Plantinga, that there is a contradiction in their argument and a version of this principle is not absolutely correct.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)