Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Submitted January 14, 2022
Published 2022-01-14

Artículos

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): REICIT

Institutional self-assessment methodology of environmental management in the context of public higher education of Panama.


Cover image

Citación:
DOI: ND

Published: 2022-01-14

How to Cite

Tejedor De León, E., Araya, R. and Tejedor-Flores, N. (2022) “Institutional self-assessment methodology of environmental management in the context of public higher education of Panama”., REICIT, 1(2), pp. 52–66. Available at: https://revistas.up.ac.pa/index.php/REICIT/article/view/2608 (Accessed: 23 November 2024).

Abstract

This study proposal aims to validate a research instrument in order to collect the necessary information to generate an institutional self-evaluation methodology of environmental management, taking into consideration those aspects related to the public higher education context of Panama. The instrument was submitted for consideration by experts in the field, applying the survey method, to give their opinion on the form and content of the instrument. From this
information, the instrument was validated and the reliability and understandability were also measured, calculating Cronbach's Alpha coefficient using the statistical program R, with which it was certified that the instrument can be applied as a methodology for institutional self-evaluation of environmental management, taking into account what is proposed by the GreenMétric University Ranking. For this, the instrument (poured into a Google Forms document) was applied to a population sample, composed of teachers (82) and students (200), who work or study at the
Regional University Centers of Azuero, Coclé and Veraguas. The first version of the questionnaire is, built, with the six sections of the aforementioned Index (Environment and Infrastructure; Energy
and Climate Change; Waste; Water; Transportation; Education and Research). Finally, the questionnaire, contains, nineteen (19) items constructed with a Likert scale. Thirty-three (33) dichotomous items, to be answered yes or no.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)