HABITUACIÓN A LA INTERACCIÓN HUMANA E IMPLICACIONES EN LA REACTIVIDAD, BIENESTAR ANIMAL Y TASA DE CONCEPCIÓN DE NOVILLAS SIMBRAH

Joseph Grajales-Cedeño; Reynaldo Vargas; Jocelyne Miranda; Alex Solís; Alex Ríos Moreno; Efraín Quintero; Reinaldo de Armas; Arianis Santos Nicolella; Gerardo Sandoya

Enviado junho 3, 2021

Publicado 2021-06-03

Artículos

v. 3 n. 2: Revista Investigaciones Agropecuarias

HABITUACIÓN A LA INTERACCIÓN HUMANA E IMPLICACIONES EN LA REACTIVIDAD, BIENESTAR ANIMAL Y TASA DE CONCEPCIÓN DE NOVILLAS SIMBRAH

Joseph Grajales-Cedeño⁺⁻
Reynaldo Vargas⁺⁻
Jocelyne Miranda⁺⁻
Alex Solís⁺⁻
Alex Ríos Moreno⁺⁻
Efraín Quintero⁺⁻
Reinaldo de Armas⁺⁻
Arianis Santos Nicolella⁺⁻
Gerardo Sandoya⁺⁻

PDF (Español (España))

Citación:

DOI: ND

Publicado: 2021-06-03

Como Citar

Grajales-Cedeño, J., Vargas, R., Miranda, J., Solís, A., Ríos Moreno, A., Quintero, E., de Armas, R., Santos Nicolella, A., & Sandoya, G. (2021). HABITUACIÓN A LA INTERACCIÓN HUMANA E IMPLICACIONES EN LA REACTIVIDAD, BIENESTAR ANIMAL Y TASA DE CONCEPCIÓN DE NOVILLAS SIMBRAH. Revista Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 3(2), 1–20. Recuperado de https://revistas.up.ac.pa/index.php/investigaciones_agropecuarias/article/view/2167

Declaração de Direito Autoral

Resumo

En este estudio se evaluó el efecto de la de la habituación a la interacción humana sobre la reactividad, bienestar animal y tasa de concepción en novillas Simbrah. El mismo se realizó la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Panamá. Se utilizaron dieciséis animales divididos al azar en dos grupos: Novillas habituadas a la interacción humana (CH; n=9), con edad de 19±0.8 meses, condición corporal de 3.1±0.1 y peso de 358.6±10.8 kg. El grupo control o novillas no habituadas a la interacción humana (SH; n=7), conformado por animales con 20.1±1.5 meses, condición corporal de 3.11± 0.09 y peso de 364±19.16 kg. Los datos se analizaron con el programa estadístico R versión 4.0.4 mediante un modelo lineal generalizado. Los resultandos indican que hubo diferencias significativas en la reactividad entre el grupo de novillas CH y SH (p<0.001) y del tiempo (p=0.001). De manera general las novillas habituadas (CH) y sin habituación (SH) a la interacción humana tuvieron un score en el brete de contención de 1.12±0.08 y 2.75±0.43 respectivamente (p=0.001). Al día diez los animales CH y SH mostraron una reactividad de 1.12±0.12 y 3.5±0.46 respectivamente (p=0.001). Con relación a los indicadores fisiológicos el grupo CH presento una menor frecuencia cardiaca con respecto al grupo SH (64.38±2.42 vs 73.31±2.65 LC/min; p=0.03). Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias en la temperatura rectal (p>0.05). En el grupo de novillas CH y SH la tasa de concepción fue de [(55% y 43% respectivamente ?²₁=2.88; p=0.08). En conclusión, los resultados apoyan la hipótesis que la habituación a la interacción humana tuvo un efecto positivo sobre la reactividad, una menor frecuencia cardiaca y mejor desempeño reproductivo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Andrade, O., Orihuela, A., Solano, J., & Galina, C.S. (2001). Some effects of repeated handling and the use of a mask on stress responses in zebu cattle during restraint. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 71, 175-181.
Barbosa Silveira, I.D., Fischer V., & Wiegand, M.M. (2008). Reactividad em bovinos de corte: métodos de medida em diferentes sistemas produtivos. Archivos de Zootecnia, 57, 321-332.
Bates, J.E. (1989). Concepts and measures of temperament. In: Kohnstamm, G.A., Rothbart, M.K. (Eds.), Temperament in Childhood. Wiley, New-York, pp. 3–26
Boivin, X., Le Neindre, P., Chupin, J.M., Garel, J.P., & Trillat, G. (1992). Influence of breed and early management on ease of handling and open field behaviour of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 32, 313-323.
Braga, J.S., Faucitano, L., Macitelli, F., Sant’Anna, A. C., Méthot, S., & Paranhos da Costa, M.J. R. (2018). Temperament effects on performance and adaptability of Nellore young bulls to the feedlot environment. Livestock Science, 216, 88–93.
Breen, K.M., & Karsch, F.J. (2004). Does cortisol inhibit pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion at the hypothalamic or pituitary level? Endocrinology, 145, 692-698.
Breuer, K., Hemsworth, P.H., & Coleman, C.J. (2003). The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of nonlactating heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 84, 3-22.
Broom, D.M., & Johnson, K.G. (1993). Stress and animal welfare. London: Chapman, Hall. 211p.
Burrow, H.M., & Dillon, R. D. (1997). Relationships between reactivity and growth in a feedlot and commercial carcass traits of Bos indicus crossbreds. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 407-411.
Cafe, L.M., Robinson, D.L., Ferguson, D.M., Geesink, G.H., & Greenwood, P.L. (2011a). Temperament and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function are related and combine to affect growth, efficiency, carcass, and meat quality traits in Brahman steers. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 40, 230–240.
Cafe, L.M., Robinson, D.L., Ferguson, D.M., McIntyre, B.L., Geesink, G.H., & Greenwood, P.L. (2011b). Cattle reactivity: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science, 89, 1452-1465.
Ceballos, M.C., Sant’Anna, A.C., Góis, K.C.R., Ferraudo, A.S., Negrao, J.A., & da Costa, M.J.R.P. (2018). Investigating the relationship between human-animal interactions, reactivity, stress response and reproductive performance in Nellore heifers. Livestock Science, 217, 65-75.
Ceballos, M.C., Góis, K.C.R., Sant'Anna, A.C., & Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R. (2016). Frequent handling of grazing beef cattle maintained under the rotational stocking method improves reactivity over time. Animal Production Science, 58 (2) 307-313.
Coleman, G.J. & Hemsworth, P.H. (2014). Training to improve stockperson beliefs and behaviour towards livestock enhances welfare and productivity. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 33, 131-137.
Cooke, R.F., Schubach, K.M., Marques, R.S., Peres, R.F.G., Silva, L.G.T., Carvalho, R.S., … Vasconcelos, J.L.M. (2017). Effects of reactivity on physiological, productive, and reproductive responses in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science, 95(1), 1–8.
Cooke, R.F., Bohnert, D.W., Cappellozza, B.I., Mueller, C.J., & del Curto, T. (2012). Effects of reactivity and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. Journal of Animal Science, 90(10), 3547–3555.
Cooke, R., Bohnert, D., Meneghetti, M., Losi, T., & Vasconcelos, J. (2011). Effects of reactivity on pregnancy rates to fixed-timed AI in Bos indicus beef cows. Livestock Science, 142 (1-3), 108-113.
Cooke, R.F., Arthington, J.D., Araujo, D.B., & Lamb, G.C. (2009a). Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, tem- perament, physiological responses, and pregnancy rates of Brahman- crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science 87, 4125–4132.
Cooke, R.F., Arthington, J.D., Austin, B.R., & Yelich, J.V. (2009b). Effects of acclimation to handling on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 87, 3403–3412.
Costa, F. de O., Valente, T.S., de Toledo, L.M., Ambrósio, L.A., Campo, M. del, & Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R. (2021). A conceptual model of the human-animal relationships dynamics during newborn handling on cow-calf operation farms. Livestock Science, 246, 104462.
Curley, K.O., Neuendorff, D.A., Lewis, A.W., Cleere, J.J., Welsh, Jr, T.H., & Randel, R.D, (2008). Functional characteristics of the bovine hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal axis vary with temperament. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 20–27.
Curley, K.O., Paschal, J.C., Welsh, T.H., & Randel, R.D. (2006). Technical note: Exit velocity as a measure of cattle reactivity is repeatable and associated with serum concentration of cortisol in Brahman bulls. Journal of Animal Science, 84(11), 3100–3103.
Dobson, H., Tebble, J.E., Phogat, J.B., & Smith, R.F. (1999). Effect of transport on pulsatile and surge secretion of LH in ewes in the breeding season. Journal Reproduction Fertility, 116,1–8.
Erickson, H.H. (2017). Sistema cardiovascular. En W.O., Reece., H.H., Erickson, J.P., Goff, E.E., Uemura (Ed.), Duke’s Fisiologia dos animais domésticos. 13 ed. pp. 632-776. Rio de Janeiro: Brasil.
Errico, A., Errico, R., Errico, S., Mihura, H., Cabodevila, J., & Callejas, C.J. (2015). Efecto del manejo sobre el comportamiento y la preñez a la IATF en vaquillonas Angus. Taurus (1), 18-21.
Ellingsen, K., Coleman, G.J., Lund, V., & Mejdell, C.M. (2014). Using qualitative behavior assessment to explore the link between stockperson behavior and dairy calf behavior. Applied Animal Behavior Science 153, 10-17.
Fina, M., Casellas, J., Manteca, X., & Piedrafita, J. (2006). Analysis of reactivity development during the fattening period in the semi-feral bovine calves of the alberes massif. Animal Research, EDP Sciences, 55, 389-395.
Fraser, D. (2008). Animal Welfare and the Intensification of Animal Production. Springer, Dordrecht. 167-189.
Fraser, A.F., & Broom, D.M. (1990). Farm animal behaviour and welfare. London: Balliere Tindall then CABI, pp. 437
Grajales-Cedeño, J., Atencio, H., Vargas, R., Ríos-Moreno, A., Quintero, E., Cedeño, H., & Bethancourt, J. (2020). Efecto de la doma racional sobre la reactividad, relación humano-animal y desempeño productivo en novillas cruzadas. Revista Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 2(2), 69-85.
Grandin, T., & Shivley, C. (2015). How farm animals react and perceive stressful situations such as handling, restraint, and transport. Animals 5(4), 1233–1251.
Grandin, T. (1999). Safe handling of large animals. Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews 14, 195-212
Grandin, T., (1997). Assessment of stress during handling and transport. Journal of Animal Science, 75, 249-257.
Hemsworth, P.H., Sherwen, S.L., Coleman, G.J., Human contact. In: Appleby M, editor. Animal Welfare. Wallingford: CAB International (2018). p. 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786390202.0294
Hemsworth, P.H., & Coleman, G.J. (2011). A model of stockperson-animal interactions and their implications for livestock. Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperso1-68n and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals, 120-134.
Hemsworth, P.H., & Coleman, G.J. (1998). Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. Wallingford: CAB International.
Herman, A.P., Romanowicz, K., & Tomaszewska-Zaremba, D. (2010). Effect of LPS on reproductive system at the level of the pituitary of anestrous ewes. Reproduction Domestic Animal, 45, 351–359.
Kasimanickam, R., Asay, M., Schroeder, S., Kasimanickam, V., Gay, J.M., Kastelic, J.P., & Whittier, W.D. (2014). Calm reactivity improves reproductive performance of beef cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals = Zuchthygiene, 49(6), 1063-1067.
Krohn, C.C., Jago, J.G. & Boivin, X. (2001). The effect of early handling on the socialisation of young calves to humans. Applied Animal Behavior Science 74,121-133.
Mello, B.P., Maturana Filho, M., Lemes, K. M., Gonçalvez, R.L., Lollato, J.P.M., Zanella, A.J., & Membrive, C.M.B. (2020). Importance of reactivity in the pregnancy by timed insemination in bovine females Bos taurus indicus. Livestock Science, 240, 1-6.
Mellor, D.J., Beausoleil, N.J., Littlewood, K.E., Mclean, A.N., Mcgreevy, P.D., Jones, B., & Wilkins, C. (2020). The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals 10, 1870, 1-24.
Mellor, D. (2016). Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living.” Animals, 6(3), 1-20.
Mellor, D.J., Patterson-Kane, E., & Stafford, K.J. (2009). Human-animal interactions, and animal welfare. In the Sciences of Animal Welfare; Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 113–130.
Mellor, D.J., & Reid, C.S.W. (1994). Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals. In Improving the Well-Being of Animals in the Research Environment; Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART): Glen Osmond, SA, Australia, 3-18.
Mota-Rojas, D., Broom, D.M., Orihuela, A., Velarde, A., Napolitano, F., & Alonso-Spilsbury, M. (2020). Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 8(3), 196-205.
Pajor, E.A., Rushen, J., & De Passillé, A.M.B. (2000). Aversion learning techniques to evaluate dairy cattle handling practices. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 69, 89-102.
Parham, J.T., Tanner, A.E., Barkley, K., Pullen, L., Wahlberg, M.L., Swecker, W.S., & Lewis, R.M. (2019). Temperamental cattle acclimate more substantially to repeated handling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 212, 36–43.
Paranhos da Costa, M., & Ceballos, M. (2021). Benefícios econômicos e sociais relacionados à promoção do bem-estar de bovinos leiteiros e de corte, Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomia, 74(S17-24), 21-24.
Paranhos Da Costa, M.J.R., & Tarazona, A. (2011). Practical approach on how to improve the welfare in cattle. Revista Colombiana de Ciências Pecuarias, 24, (3), 347-359.
Petherick, J.C., Doogan, V.J., Holroyd, R.G., Olsson, P., & Venus, B.K. (2009). Quality of handling and holding yard environment, and beef cattle reactivity: 1. Relationships with flight speed and fear of humans. Appleid Animal Behaviour Science, 120, 18-27.
Pierce, B., Hemsworth, P.H., Rivalland, E.T.A., Wagenmaker, E.R., Morrissey, A.D., Papargiris, M.M., Clarke, I.J., Karsch, F.J., Turner, A.I., & Tilbrook, A.J. (2008). Psychosocial stress suppresses attractivity, proceptivity and pulsatile LH secretion in the ewe. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 424-434.
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Reece, W., & Dukes. H.H. (2017). Temperatura corporal e sua regulação. En W.O., Reece., H.H., Erickson, J.P., Goff, E.E., Uemura (Ed.), Duke’s Fisiologia dos animais domésticos 13 ed. pp. 346-359. Rio de Janeiro: Brasil.
Rueda, P.M., Sant'Anna, A.C., Valente, T.S., & Paranhos da Costa, M.J.P. (2015). Impact of the reactivity of Nellore cows on the quality of handling and pregnancy rates in fixed-time artificial insemination. Livestock Science, 177, 189-195.
Rueda P.M. (2012). Qualidade de manejo e temperamento de bovinos: efeitos na eficiência reprodutiva de fêmeas submetidas a um protocolo de inseminação artificial em tempo fixo. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal, Brasil. 74p.
Rueda, P.M., Lima, V.A., Sant’anna, A.C., & Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R. (2011). Differences behavioural in Nelore cows before and after use of intravaginal device of progesterone. In: ISAE - 45th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 2011, Indianapolis, IN, EUA. Anais eletrônicos, 158 p.
Rueda, P.M. (2009). Alterações comportamentais e hematológicas em vacas nelore submetidas à protocolo de inseminação artificial em tempo fixo. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. 55 p.
Rueda, P.M., Costa E Silva, E.V., Passos, T.S., Russi, L.S., & Dias, F.C.F., Stupp, W., Zuccari, C. E. S. N. (2005). Reatividade de fêmeas bovinas e eficiência reprodutiva em inseminação artificial – resultados preliminares. in: Reunião anual da sociedade brasileira de zootecnia, 42, Goiânia - GO.
Stahringer, R.C., Randel, R.D. & Neuendorff, D.A. (1990). Effects of naloxone and animal reactivity on serum luteinizing-hormone and cortisol concentrations in seasonally anestrous Brahman heifers. Theriogenology 34, 393-406.
Titto, E.A.L., Titto, C.G., Gatto, E.G., Silva, N.C.M., Mourão, G.B., Nogueira Filho, J.C.M., & Pereira, A.M.F. (2010). Reactivity of nellore steers in two feedlot housing systems and its relationship with plasmatic cortisol. Livestock Science, 129, 146-150.
Thompson, R.F., & Spencer, W.A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychological Review, 73, 16–43.
Waiblinger, S. (2019) Agricultural animals. In Geoff H and Vicky M (eds), Anthrozoology Human-Animal Interaction in Domesticated and Wild Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–58.
Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., Tosi, M.V., Janczak, A.M., Visser, E.K., & Jones, R.B. (2006). Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species; A critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 101, 185-242.
Zulkifli, I. (2013). Review of human-animal interactions and their impact on animal productivity and welfare. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 4 (25), 2-7.